An informed modern plan for post-2020 American foreign policy that avoids the opposing dangers of retrenchment and overextension
Russia and China are both believed to have âgrand strategiesââdetailed sets of national security goals backed by means, and plans, to pursue them. In the United States, policy makers have tried to articulate similar concepts but have failed to reach a widespread consensus since the Cold War ended. While the United States has been the worldâs prominent superpower for over a generation, much American thinking has oscillated between the extremes of isolationist agendas versus interventionist and overly assertive ones.
Drawing on historical precedents and weighing issues such as Russiaâs resurgence, Chinaâs great rise, North Koreaâs nuclear machinations, and Middle East turmoil, Michael OâHanlon presents a wellâ âresearched, ethically sound, and politically viable vision for American national security policy. He also proposes complementing the Pentagonâs set of â4+1â pre-existing threats with a new â4+1â: biological, nuclear, digital, climatic, and internal dangers.
The Art of War in an Age of Peace - Michael O'Hanlon
An informed modern plan for post-2020 American foreign policy that avoids the opposing dangers of retrenchment and overextension
Russia and China are both believed to have âgrand strategiesââdetailed sets of national security goals backed by means, and plans, to pursue them. In the United States, policy makers have tried to articulate similar concepts but have failed to reach a widespread consensus since the Cold War ended. While the United States has been the worldâs prominent superpower for over a generation, much American thinking has oscillated between the extremes of isolationist agendas versus interventionist and overly assertive ones.
Drawing on historical precedents and weighing issues such as Russiaâs resurgence, Chinaâs great rise, North Koreaâs nuclear machinations, and Middle East turmoil, Michael OâHanlon presents a wellâ âresearched, ethically sound, and politically viable vision for American national security policy. He also proposes complementing the Pentagonâs set of â4+1â pre-existing threats with a new â4+1â: biological, nuclear, digital, climatic, and internal dangers.