Jean Stafford's unforgettable portrait of Marguerite Oswald, the mother of Lee Harvey Oswald.
Curious about âthe influences and accidents and loves and antipathies and idiosyncrasiesâ that shaped Lee Harvey Oswald, the novelist and short story writer Jean Stafford spent nine hours interviewing Marguerite Oswald in May 1965. A Mother in History (1966) is the acerbic result, an indelible portrait of a woman hungry for money, fame, and attention, full of righteous self-pity, and relentless in professing her sonâs blamelessness: âKilling does not necessarily mean badness. You find killing in some very fine homes for one reason or another.â Staffordâs controversial profile elicited mixed reviewsâNewsweek praised it as a âmasterpiece of character study,â while Time called itâthe most abrasively unpleasant book in recent yearsââand angry readers accused her of seeking to âenthrone a wicked womanâ and âdemolish the sacred throne of motherhood.â It captures a moment in history when the trauma of Dallas was still raw, Lee Harvey Oswaldâs guilt was widely accepted, and Marguerite Oswald, with her obsessive âresearchâ into hidden âtruthsâ and the machinations of an omnipresent âthey,â appeared to be a singular prisoner of maternal delusion, and not a harbinger of the decades to come.
Jean Stafford's unforgettable portrait of Marguerite Oswald, the mother of Lee Harvey Oswald.
Curious about âthe influences and accidents and loves and antipathies and idiosyncrasiesâ that shaped Lee Harvey Oswald, the novelist and short story writer Jean Stafford spent nine hours interviewing Marguerite Oswald in May 1965. A Mother in History (1966) is the acerbic result, an indelible portrait of a woman hungry for money, fame, and attention, full of righteous self-pity, and relentless in professing her sonâs blamelessness: âKilling does not necessarily mean badness. You find killing in some very fine homes for one reason or another.â Staffordâs controversial profile elicited mixed reviewsâNewsweek praised it as a âmasterpiece of character study,â while Time called itâthe most abrasively unpleasant book in recent yearsââand angry readers accused her of seeking to âenthrone a wicked womanâ and âdemolish the sacred throne of motherhood.â It captures a moment in history when the trauma of Dallas was still raw, Lee Harvey Oswaldâs guilt was widely accepted, and Marguerite Oswald, with her obsessive âresearchâ into hidden âtruthsâ and the machinations of an omnipresent âthey,â appeared to be a singular prisoner of maternal delusion, and not a harbinger of the decades to come.